Resources / research audit

Research Audit Archive

This is not the price tool. It is the supporting record: coverage audits, source scoring, research waves, and the limitations found while building the City Pricing Library.

How to read this archive

Research history, not marketing copy.

The early coverage audit classified 70 destinations by evidence strength: 44 beta candidates, 15 locations needing another independent source, and 11 still in progress. Later research passes produced the 66 city planning records used in the current tool; four unsupported Laos locations were removed rather than estimated.

Individual city records show the site’s planning estimates used in the Route Builder, not live provider quotes. This archive shows the research history, including source-quality limitations, because that context matters when comparing a city or making a financial decision.

Browse the city pricing library

Reader’s guide · September 13, 2026

How to challenge a planning number

An archive is a record of the research process, not a certificate that every figure is current. Some files are drafts and describe gaps that later work may address. Read the document date and status before treating a statement as the current position.

  1. Identify the model. The exploratory-trip records describe a short stay for one adult, including private lodging, food, local transport, modest activities, and a buffer. They are not the same model as a long-term household budget.
  2. Check the exclusions. The August coverage audit excludes international flights, visa fees, health insurance, nightlife, shopping, and discounted long-term leases from its default short-stay range. Add relevant exclusions to your own plan.
  3. Inspect source independence. Two articles repeating the same underlying table are not two independent observations. The scorecard distinguishes transparent city-level components from broad country summaries.
  4. Check the weakest major component. Good food-price evidence cannot rescue a rental estimate with the wrong lease duration or season. Ask for a current accommodation quote with the same dates and occupancy as your trip.
  5. Keep uncertainty visible. “Beta candidate” meant enough evidence for a cautious range at that stage, not a guaranteed price. “One source away” and “Research in progress” explicitly describe unfinished evidence.

A concrete comparison trap

Suppose one source reports a resident’s monthly lease and another reports a visitor’s furnished apartment for four weeks. Even if both describe the same city, averaging the amounts can produce a number that matches neither offer. Keep the stay length, deposit, furnishing, utility terms, and source date beside the amount before deciding whether they can be compared.

Where each record belongs

Use the City Pricing Library for the short-stay estimate displayed by the site. Use the monthly budget research to inspect the separate living-cost model. Use the inflation and price-level guide to understand why a national trend should not automatically adjust every row.

Found a conflict or outdated source?

Send a correction with the city, the page or archive filename, the disputed category, the reference date, and a public source we can inspect. Do not send private booking confirmations, payment details, or identity documents. A specific correction is more useful than an unexplained replacement total.